diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c | 26 | 
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c index e3cd1ffad2f..ac4092591ae 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nftlmount.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@  /* find_boot_record: Find the NFTL Media Header and its Spare copy which contains the   *	various device information of the NFTL partition and Bad Unit Table. Update - *	the ReplUnitTable[] table accroding to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[] + *	the ReplUnitTable[] table according to the Bad Unit Table. ReplUnitTable[]   *	is used for management of Erase Unit in other routines in nftl.c and nftlmount.c   */  static int find_boot_record(struct NFTLrecord *nftl) @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static int check_free_sectors(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int address, int   *   * Return: 0 when succeed, -1 on error.   * - *  ToDo: 1. Is it neceressary to check_free_sector after erasing ?? + *  ToDo: 1. Is it necessary to check_free_sector after erasing ??   */  int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)  { @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int NFTL_formatblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)  		nb_erases = le32_to_cpu(uci.WearInfo);  		nb_erases++; -		/* wrap (almost impossible with current flashs) or free block */ +		/* wrap (almost impossible with current flash) or free block */  		if (nb_erases == 0)  			nb_erases = 1; @@ -363,10 +363,10 @@ fail:   *	Mark as 'IGNORE' each incorrect sector. This check is only done if the chain   *	was being folded when NFTL was interrupted.   * - *	The check_free_sectors in this function is neceressary. There is a possible + *	The check_free_sectors in this function is necessary. There is a possible   *	situation that after writing the Data area, the Block Control Information is   *	not updated according (due to power failure or something) which leaves the block - *	in an umconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this + *	in an inconsistent state. So we have to check if a block is really FREE in this   *	case. */  static void check_sectors_in_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)  { @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)  	for (;;) {  		length++; -		/* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranted not to +		/* avoid infinite loops, although this is guaranteed not to  		   happen because of the previous checks */  		if (length >= nftl->nb_blocks) {  			printk("nftl: length too long %d !\n", length); @@ -447,11 +447,11 @@ static int calc_chain_length(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)  /* format_chain: Format an invalid Virtual Unit chain. It frees all the Erase Units in a   *	Virtual Unit Chain, i.e. all the units are disconnected.   * - *	It is not stricly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because + *	It is not strictly correct to begin from the first block of the chain because   *	if we stop the code, we may see again a valid chain if there was a first_block   *	flag in a block inside it. But is it really a problem ?   * - * FixMe: Figure out what the last statesment means. What if power failure when we are + * FixMe: Figure out what the last statement means. What if power failure when we are   *	in the for (;;) loop formatting blocks ??   */  static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block) @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static void format_chain(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned int first_block)   *	totally free (only 0xff).   *   * Definition: Free Erase Unit -- A properly erased/formatted Free Erase Unit should have meet the - *	following critia: + *	following criteria:   *	1. */  static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)  { @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)  	erase_mark = le16_to_cpu ((h1.EraseMark | h1.EraseMark1));  	if (erase_mark != ERASE_MARK) {  		/* if no erase mark, the block must be totally free. This is -		   possible in two cases : empty filsystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */ +		   possible in two cases : empty filesystem or interrupted erase (very unlikely) */  		if (check_free_sectors (nftl, block * nftl->EraseSize, nftl->EraseSize, 1) != 0)  			return -1; @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static int check_and_mark_free_block(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int block)  /* get_fold_mark: Read fold mark from Unit Control Information #2, we use FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS   *	to indicate that we are in the progression of a Virtual Unit Chain folding. If the UCI #2   *	is FOLD_MARK_IN_PROGRESS when mounting the NFTL, the (previous) folding process is interrupted - *	for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is neceressary in this case. + *	for some reason. A clean up/check of the VUC is necessary in this case.   *   * WARNING: return 0 if read error   */ @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s)  						printk("Block %d: incorrect logical block: %d expected: %d\n",  						       block, logical_block, first_logical_block);  						/* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, -						   but we need to read it completly */ +						   but we need to read it completely */  						do_format_chain = 1;  					}  					if (is_first_block) { @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ int NFTL_mount(struct NFTLrecord *s)  							printk("Block %d: incorrectly marked as first block in chain\n",  							       block);  							/* the chain is incorrect : we must format it, -							   but we need to read it completly */ +							   but we need to read it completely */  							do_format_chain = 1;  						} else {  							printk("Block %d: folding in progress - ignoring first block flag\n",  |