Merge tag 'v3.9-rc5' into wq/for-3.10

Writeback conversion to workqueue will be based on top of wq/for-3.10
branch to take advantage of custom attrs and NUMA support for unbound
workqueues.  Mainline currently contains two commits which result in
non-trivial merge conflicts with wq/for-3.10 and because
block/for-3.10/core is based on v3.9-rc3 which contains one of the
conflicting commits, we need a pre-merge-window merge anyway.  Let's
pull v3.9-rc5 into wq/for-3.10 so that the block tree doesn't suffer
from workqueue merge conflicts.

The two conflicts and their resolutions:

* e68035fb65 ("workqueue: convert to idr_alloc()") in mainline changes
  worker_pool_assign_id() to use idr_alloc() instead of the old idr
  interface.  worker_pool_assign_id() goes through multiple locking
  changes in wq/for-3.10 causing the following conflict.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  do {
		  if (!idr_pre_get(&worker_pool_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
			  return -ENOMEM;
		  ret = idr_get_new(&worker_pool_idr, pool, &pool->id);
	  } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
  =======
	  mutex_lock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0)
		  pool->id = ret;
	  mutex_unlock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

	  return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
  }

  We want locking from the former and idr_alloc() usage from the
  latter, which can be combined to the following.

  static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
  {
	  int ret;

	  lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);

	  ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
	  if (ret >= 0) {
		  pool->id = ret;
		  return 0;
	  }
	  return ret;
   }

* eb2834285c ("workqueue: fix possible pool stall bug in
  wq_unbind_fn()") updated wq_unbind_fn() such that it has single
  larger for_each_std_worker_pool() loop instead of two separate loops
  with a schedule() call inbetween.  wq/for-3.10 renamed
  pool->assoc_mutex to pool->manager_mutex causing the following
  conflict (earlier function body and comments omitted for brevity).

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
  <<<<<<< HEAD
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
	  }
  =======
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89

		  schedule();

  <<<<<<< HEAD
	  for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
  =======
  >>>>>>> c67bf5361e7e66a0ff1f4caf95f89347d55dfb89
		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

  The resolution is mostly trivial.  We want the control flow of the
  latter with the rename of the former.

  static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  ...
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);

		  schedule();

		  atomic_set(&pool->nr_running, 0);

		  spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
		  wake_up_worker(pool);
		  spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
	  }
  }

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 7e93df6585e..df32a090d08 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ static inline void cpsw_add_default_vlan(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
 
 	writel(vlan, &priv->host_port_regs->port_vlan);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++)
 		slave_write(priv->slaves + i, vlan, reg);
 
 	cpsw_ale_add_vlan(priv->ale, vlan, ALE_ALL_PORTS << port,
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t cpsw_ndo_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	/* If there is no more tx desc left free then we need to
 	 * tell the kernel to stop sending us tx frames.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(cpdma_check_free_tx_desc(priv->txch)))
+	if (unlikely(!cpdma_check_free_tx_desc(priv->txch)))
 		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
 
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_platform_data *data,
 		struct platform_device *mdio;
 
 		parp = of_get_property(slave_node, "phy_id", &lenp);
-		if ((parp == NULL) && (lenp != (sizeof(void *) * 2))) {
+		if ((parp == NULL) || (lenp != (sizeof(void *) * 2))) {
 			pr_err("Missing slave[%d] phy_id property\n", i);
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto error_ret;